点击右上角
微信好友
朋友圈
请使用浏览器分享功能进行分享
深化京港合作、运用绿色投资 政协委员为“绿色北京”支招******
中新网北京1月18日电 (记者 刘文曦 杜燕)深化京港绿色金融合作、运用绿色投资“组合拳”、发展绿色建筑……正在召开的北京市政协十四届一次会议上，北京市政协委员们围绕大力实施绿色北京战略，着力改善生态环境建言献策。
北京市政协委员、香港上海汇丰银行有限公司亚太区联席行政总裁廖宜建从发挥京港优势资源，促进两地金融深度合作的角度，为建设绿色北京建言献策。他建议，首先要发挥香港资本市场的国际化优势，为北京连通国际绿色投融资市场。香港位列全球四大国际金融中心，连通世界金融市场，汇聚世界领先的绿色金融评估认证机构和国际投资者，可以作为北京与国际接轨的绿色投融资平台。
他谈到，京港要加强协调合作，共同为绿色金融国际标准的发展做出中国贡献。北京可以借助香港丰富的国际化经验，完善的国际金融监管体系，领先的绿色金融机构和人才资源，进一步深化京港绿色金融合作。
廖宜建认为，未来，京港两地可以自愿碳减排交易为抓手，就共建国际化碳交易市场开展更多交流。通过联合成立国际化碳交易市场研究小组，邀请两地政府、智库、交易所、金融机构等定期沟通，尝试制定京港共建国际化碳交易市场方案，助力“绿色北京”战略，支持首都高质量发展。
北京市政协委员们围绕大力实施绿色北京战略，着力改善生态环境建言献策。 杜燕 摄来自教育界别的北京市政协委员、北京国家会计学院教授李旭红从绿色投资和环境保护税收的角度建言绿色发展。李旭红建议，应该用好绿色投资的“组合拳”。通过商业金融、专项财政资金、地方专项债以及政策性金融等多元化的投资工具组合助力生态恢复、保护自然资源、发展绿色产能并打造人与自然融合的便民设施，提高绿色公共服务均等化水平，形成国内外高端人才聚集及北京民众青睐的绿色宜居国际大都市。同时，可加强环境保护税征收管理，解决基本性环境保护问题，并使环境保护税与资源税、消费税等其他税收政策建立协同效应的基础上，着重利用现有的税制促进碳减排，构建绿色友好环境。
李旭红举例称，在企业所得税中，可加大对企业减碳技术投入的税前扣除优惠力度。同时，通过适度的地方财政补贴以及加大地方税的调节，以促进减少碳排放及增强绿色消费行为，关注碳税的发展动态，并构建“绿色低碳”的地方税收体系，助力北京实现绿色发展，促进人与自然和谐共生。
来自无党派人士界别的北京市政协委员、北京市保障性住房建设投资中心副总经理李持缨从绿色建筑的角度建言。李持缨表示，北京保障房中心自成立以来，一直将推动装配式实施作为企业发展的战略，努力向首都民众提供节能、绿色、低碳、宜居的高品质保障性住房。
李持缨指出，目前装配式建筑在实施效果方面主要有两项成果。一是装配式建筑节能降耗和减少用工效果明显；二是提高建造效率、提高房屋质量。未来，应坚持顶层设计，推动工业化建造理念认同；加大政策扶持力度，推动装配式建筑落地实施；推广建筑师负责制工程总承包模式，完善装配式建筑建设管理体系；加大科技创新力度，提升装配式建筑技术水平。(完)
中新网评：处理核污水绝不是日本自家私事****** 中新网北京1月19日电(蒋鲤)日本政府近日称，将于2023年春夏期间开始向海洋排放经过处理的福岛第一核电站核污水。日本罔顾国内民众及周边国家的屡屡反对，企图将核污水“一倒了之”，把一件关乎全球海洋生态环境和公众健康的事当成了自家私事。  资料图：日本福岛第一核电站。2011年，福岛核电站事故发生后，大量放射性物质泄漏到大气层和太平洋，对周围环境造成了难以逆转的伤害，数十万人被迫撤离该地区。时至今日，作为日本邻国之一的韩国仍未解除福岛海鲜禁令。 日本以核污水存储能力即将达到上限为由，在2021年4月13日，正式决定将福岛第一核电站核污水排入太平洋。过去一年多，日本政府和东京电力公司一直在持续推进核污水排海计划。 日本政府辩称，这些核污水经多核素处理系统(ALPS)处理后很安全，甚至“可以喝”，这样的表态无疑在愚弄大众。 事实上，经过处理的核污水仍含有多种放射性物质，核污水一旦排放入海就无法回收，长期来看，将会给海洋生态带来难以估量的潜在威胁，最终危害人类健康。 因此，核污水排海计划推出后，遭到日本民众强烈反对。日本《朝日新闻》2022年3月公布的问卷调查显示，福岛县、宫城县和岩手县受访的42个市町村长中，约六成反对东京电力公司福岛第一核电站核污水排放入海。日本全国渔业协会联合会也多次申明立场，反对该计划。 日本政府认为，核污水排海是最便宜、最省事的解决方案，但此举却将周边国家乃至全世界置于核污染风险中。太平洋非日本一家之海，核污水会随着洋流流动，其影响势必会跨越国界，危害周边国家乃至整个国际社会的公共福祉和利益。 《韩国经济新闻》发文称，相关研究认为，福岛核污水如果排放入海，约7个月后将到达济州等韩国海域，该国水产业和旅游业将遭受相当大的损失。 德国南极海洋机构也曾发出警告，若日本将所有核污水排入海中，不到半年，整个太平洋都将面临高度辐射威胁，包括远在大洋另一端的美国。太平洋地区人民更是对日本该计划持反对意见。 日本作为《联合国海洋法公约》缔约国，有义务保护海洋环境。然而，在核污水排海方案的正当性、核污水数据的可靠性、净化装置的有效性、环境影响的不确定性等问题上，日本未能作出科学、可信的说明。 国际原子能机构技术工作组虽已三次赴日实地考察评估，但尚未就日排海方案的安全性给出结论，并且对日本提出诸多澄清要求和整改意见。在此情况下，日本仍执意推进核污水排海工程建设，这是极不负责任的行为。 太平洋不是日本的下水道，日本必须正视各方合理关切，在与周边国家等相关利益方和国际原子能机构充分协商后，制定合理的核污水处理方案。日本也要着眼长远，若只顾眼前，执意将核污水排放入海，不仅其自身，周边国家乃至全世界都将为之买单，其后果必将会危害数代人。  Fukushima water disposal by no means Japan’s own business By John Lee (ECNS) -- Japan has announced it will release treated wastewater from the wrecked Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant into the Pacific Ocean this year. Although Fukushima wastewater disposal affects global marine ecological environment protection and public health, Japan has turned a deaf ear to domestic and international opposition to dumping the contaminated water into the sea, treating the "global" matter as its own business. The Fukushima accident in 2011 had sent large quantities of radiation into the atmosphere and the Pacific Ocean, causing irreversible damage to the surrounding environment, and hundreds of thousands of people were forced to evacuate the area. South Korea still maintains its import ban on Japanese seafood from areas affected by the Fukushima nuclear disaster. On April 13, 2021, Japan announced it had decided to discharge contaminated radioactive wastewater in Fukushima Prefecture into the sea due to dwindling storage space, with the Japanese government and plant operator Tokyo Electric Power Company Holdings Inc. promoting the release plan over the past year. The Japanese government argues that the water treated by an advanced liquid processing system, or ALPS, is safe and drinkable, which is undoubtedly fooling the public. In fact, the treated wastewater still includes a variety of radioactive substances and can’t be recycled once discharged into the sea, which will pose a great threat to marine ecology and ultimately endanger human health in the long run. Therefore, the discharge plan has been strongly opposed in Japan. According to a questionnaire conducted by The Asahi Shimbun, nearly 60 percent of mayors of 42 municipalities in Iwate, Miyagi and Fukushima prefectures oppose the discharge plan. The National Fisheries Cooperative Federation of Japan has also repeatedly stated its opposition in public. The Japanese government believes that dumping Fukushima wastewater into the sea is the cheapest and most convenient solution, but neighboring countries and even the whole world will be at risk of nuclear pollution. The Pacific Ocean doesn’t belong to Japan and the wastewater flow along oceanic currents will surely break boundaries and endanger public welfare and the interests of neighboring countries and even the international community. The Korea Economic Daily reported that related research concluded that if contaminated water from Fukushima is released into the ocean, it would only take seven months for the contaminated water to reach the shores of Jeju Island, with the country's aquaculture and tourism suffering considerable losses. According to the calculation of a German marine scientific research institute, radioactive materials will spread to most of the Pacific Ocean within half a year from the date of discharge, and the U.S. and Canada will be affected by nuclear pollution. People in the Pacific region also oppose the discharge plan. As a participant of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, Japan has the obligation of protecting the marine environment. However, it hasn’t offered a full and convincing explanation on issues like the legitimacy of the discharge plan, the reliability of data on the nuclear-contaminated water, the efficacy of the treatment system or the uncertainty of environmental impact. Though the IAEA has yet to complete a comprehensive review after three investigations in Japan, the Japanese side has been pushing through the approval process for its discharge plan and even started building facilities for the discharge. It is rather irresponsible for Japan to act against public opinion at home and concerns abroad. The Pacific Ocean is not a private Japanese sewer. The country must seriously heed the voices of the international community and make a reasonable plan for the Fukushima wastewater disposal after full consultation with stakeholders and international agencies. If it only seeks instant interest and insists on discharging the contaminated water into the sea, not only itself, but also its neighboring countries and the entire world will pay for the decision and several generations will be forced to bear the consequence. 
|
)